On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> So, I think we have to use the new name approach.  Do we want to call it
> 2?  Or should we call it something else?
>
> Alex, do you have time to do this?

I think it's not a good solution, and the one with CURRENT_LIST_DIR is 
definitely better and already implemented.
And I am still convinced that I am right here, see my other mails.

Alex
_______________________________________________
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to