On 04/13/2011 10:46 AM, Brad King wrote: > I'll take a look at generalizing the user package registry and get back to > you.
I just merged a patch series into 'next' that does this: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=4df11977 http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=c9563dbe http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=549458f2 http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=a0d76c10 http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=b95f3cac http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=93021adb -Brad Brad King (6): find_package: Rename implementation of user package registry find_package: Cleanup user package registry less aggressively find_package: Document user package registry locations find_package: Search a "system package registry" find_package: Check both 32-bit and 64-bit registry views find_package: Test system package registry when possible Source/cmFindPackageCommand.cxx | 115 +++++++--- Source/cmFindPackageCommand.h | 10 +- Tests/FindPackageTest/CMakeLists.txt | 41 ++++ Tests/FindPackageTest/SystemPackage/CMakeTestSystemPackageConfig.cmake | 1 + 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ cmake-developers mailing list [email protected] http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
