Brad King wrote: > My proposal only requires the small change to CMake already under > discussion and makes it possible for projects to provide package > configuration files that handle components in a nice way. It also > does not preclude the possibility of a future convention.
I've been collecting links to discussions about this (and requirements for the macro I posted about before). I'll try to turn them into a coherent wiki page of all of the ideas soon, so that we'll be able to pick out some parts of it that we can aim for in CMake 2.8.9 etc. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
