On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]>wrote:
> ** > > On Tuesday 19 June 2012, David Cole wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Di., 19. Jun. 2012 19:53:39 CEST, David Cole < > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Alex and Eike, > > > > > > > > > > The following topic branches have been on the CMake stage for months, > > > > > without any movement. Are there further plans to move these topics > > > > > forward and get them into 'next' or are they simply abandoned at this > > > > > point...? > > > > > > > > Shouldn't there be a list here? > > > > > > > > Eike > > > > > > Uh, why yes, of course. Perhaps since it's after lunch now, I should > > > consider pouring myself a second cup of coffee for the day. > > > > > > (A call to 'ssh [email protected] stage cmake print' shows "next=0" for > those > > > branches not in 'next' at any given moment....) > > > > > > # Not in 'next': > > ... > > > # NinjaEclipse | master=0 next=0 > > At some point I want to get this working. > > I'm actually not convinced I'll continue on what I have there, or whether > to start fresh. > > If it's a problem for you, feel free to remove it. > > Alex > > Not really "a problem" -- just asking about them to find out the intended eventual fate of each branch. Thanks for your responses. D
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
