Stephen Kelly wrote: > Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> Stephen Kelly wrote: >>> None of the outputs have a backtrace. Any idea why? Can a backtrace be >>> provided? Reading the code, I'm not seeing which iteration is going past >>> the end. >> >> I added some asserts and found that the problem is in iterating over >> comma tokens somehow. I'll see about fixing it. > > I wrote a topic to attempt to fix this, but it seems to have had mixed > results. Bcc still fails, vs10 passes, but has a new failure in > RunCMake.TargetPropertyGeneratorExpressions: > > http://open.cdash.org/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=2614187 > > http://open.cdash.org/viewTest.php?onlydelta&buildid=2614232 > > I'm not sure if the new failure is the result of the merge or not. I'd > probably need a backtrace to diagnose the bcc failure. >
The RunCMake.TargetPropertyGeneratorExpressions failure was probably a side- effect of the incremental builds of the Continuous configuration. Still, some of the platforms fail the test, and don't give any information about why: http://open.cdash.org/testSummary.php?project=1&name=GeneratorExpression&date=2012-10-16 Can someone please provide more information (backtrace or further investigation) for one of the failing platforms? Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
