No objections here. That's at least going to smoke test the module for us. Has this been *really* tested on Windows? (Can the bug reporter test out the changes as you've made them? Presumably he tested similar changes in his own copy when he attached the patches to the bug.)
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org> wrote: > On Monday 05 November 2012, David Cole wrote: >> I like squish_v3_add_test the best: keeps the conventional prefix, but >> still indicates the version it goes with. > > Ok, done. > This is in the MakeSquish4Work on the cmake stage. > Any objections to merging this into next ? > > Alex > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
