On 12/05/2012 12:36 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> @@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ if (QT_MT_REQUIRED)
>
> "[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Trolltech\\Qt3Versions\\3.1.0;InstallDir]"
> ENV QTDIR
> ${GLOB_PATHS_LIB}
> + /usr/local
> /usr/local/qt
> /usr/lib/qt
> /usr/lib/qt3
> @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ else ()
>
> "[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Trolltech\\Qt3Versions\\3.1.0;InstallDir]"
> ENV QTDIR
> ${GLOB_PATHS_LIB}
> + /usr/local
> /usr/local/qt
> /usr/lib/qt
> /usr/lib/qt3
> @@ -136,6 +139,7 @@ find_library(QT_QASSISTANTCLIENT_LIBRARY
> "[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Trolltech\\Qt3Versions\\3.1.0;InstallDir]"
> ENV QTDIR
> ${GLOB_PATHS_LIB}
> + /usr/local
> /usr/local/qt
> /usr/lib/qt3
> /usr/share/qt3
I still don't understand the purpose of adding "/usr/local" in the PATHS
of a find_library call. We already search "/usr/local/lib" automatically.
Unless the actual library files are "/usr/local/libq*.*" the path will
not help AFAICT.
> @@ -178,6 +183,7 @@ find_program(QT_UIC_EXECUTABLE
>
> "[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Trolltech\\Qt3Versions\\3.2.0;InstallDir]/include/Qt"
>
> "[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Trolltech\\Qt3Versions\\3.1.0;InstallDir]/include/Qt"
> ${GLOB_PATHS_BIN}
> + /usr/local
> /usr/local/qt
> /usr/lib/qt
> /usr/lib/qt3
Similarly find_program already looks in /usr/local/bin.
I suspect the patch without the above hunks is sufficient. Can anyone
on OpenBSD verify this please?
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
