Stephen Kelly wrote: > I'll try again to deal with it in b(y|i)tesize chunks.
I thought I should write a high-level email too. All of your proposed changes to the plumbing are difficult to understand because you don't relate what you are proposing to what we had discussed and understood before. It would be easier if you made your proposed changes to the plumbing in the form of changes to what we'd discussed and understood before, so we can understand if it's really less complex. Starting new threads with many new concepts is not getting the stuff finished :). I'd much prefer to try to find any real issues with my topic as it currently is instead of discussing new proposals made in the name of less complexity (I don't think the new proposals are any less complex). Ever since your USE_INTERFACES email, we haven't really been working on the meat of the feature anymore. All of the commits in my topic are organized so that all the plumbing commits come before any porcelain commits, so it should be quite easy to review. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
