2013/7/8 Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]>: > On Friday 05 July 2013, Eric Noulard wrote: >> > I don't think an inappropriate amount of work or fundamental change to >> > cmake is required to achieve step 2. >> >> "innappropriate amount" heavily depends on who is doing the job but I guess >> that the already proven workload given by Stephen to CMake speaks for >> itself. I'm pretty sure he'll manage to do that. > > Since this involves changes quite in the core of cmake, I'm quite sure > somebody (Brad) would have to invest about the same amount of time into this > as Stephen. So it's not only the question whether Stephen would be able to do > it, but also whether there is a reviewer with enough time.
Yes right, I value your opinion.. I was only giving "my" point of view no more. And I did say that: "The main issue would be, could it become a nightmare to maintain?" Giving a fair amount of time one time may be done ensuring long term support may be difficult. -- Erk L'élection n'est pas la démocratie -- http://www.le-message.org -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
