2013/10/11 Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com>: > On 10/11/2013 01:09 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote: >> Will it still be able to generate DocBook, so companies can include >> the documentation in their handbook? > > It can generate whatever Sphinx can generate. IIRC Sphinx does not > currently support DocBook output but I see no reason it couldn't be > taught to do so. That would be re-usable for many other packages that > use Sphinx too.
Comparing the expressiveness, extensability, and supported backends, can you explain why you would prefer rST over AsciiDoc? Somewhere I read the analogy "markdown == child, docbook == adult w/ garb, asciidoc == adult w/ jeans & t-shirt" and I think that nails it pretty well. I thinks it was somewhere on http://asciidoctor.org/ cheers, Daniel -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
