2013/10/11 Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]>: > On Friday 11 October 2013, you wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]>wrote: >> > The thread looks somewhat unfinished, and Ralf simply didn't seem to >> > reply anymore, it would have needed just some more pushing to get it in. >> >> What kind of pushing? Code polishing? Documentation? Tests? > > Well, there was no acxtivity from Ralf anymore, and Eric is mostly maintaining > cpack.
Just to precise what I usually do a little. I try hard to give valuable advice and/or lool on CPack questions, however I seldomly use Windows so that I'm not good at testing Windows related CPack generator beside proof-reading the code. The first step would be to update the patch against current master and verify that all CPack* tests are ok. > Maybe you can push the code in a branch on cmake stage and try to get it > accepted into master ? That would be the best approach, and may be opening a feature request in the tracker as well: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/main_page.php > > Alex > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- Erk L'élection n'est pas la démocratie -- http://www.le-message.org -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
