Stephen Kelly <steveire@...> writes:
> Do you have any thoughts on the CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT problem?
Namely that
> the debian generator and the BAR generator have differing
expectations on
> what such a thing would contain. Should we have separate
> CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT_NAME and CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT_EMAIL
variables?
Eric, do you have any thoughts on this issue?
I'll soon try to revive this. See the discussion so far at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/7530
What about using the typical format that contains both name and email
address in CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT? Would "David Cole <[email protected]>"
work if used in that context for both of these generators...? Or would
that make one of them choke?
References:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2631065/what-is-the-format-of-email-header-name-email
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.4
D
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
