On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Steve Wilson <ste...@wolfram.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 17:30:11 -0700, Steve Wilson wrote: >>> I have my topic branch with the add_custom_command changes to include >>> the CONFIG keyword working. The CMake binary produced from the >>> build will correctly generated build systems that have custom commands >>> with the CONFIG keyword. I’m having trouble writing tests for the >>> changes though. When I run add_custom_command with the CONFIG >>> keyword in the test suite the CONFIG keyword does not work. >>> >>> I need a little guidance with the test suite. I’m not super familiar >>> with CTest so I’m not sure where to look next to find the problem. >>> So my question: Why would add_custom_command behave differently in >>> the tests than in regular build system generation? I have been able to determine that the code isn’t working because it seems that when running from ctest, cmake seems to be running in a configuration-less mode. Ie CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE/CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPE are not set regardless of the -C option passed to ctest. I would have thought that the build configuration of the test would match the configuration set with ‘ctest -C .'
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers