On 02/07/2014 02:34 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > I guess this will mean that "minor" release are much more frequent than > historically? (About as frequent as "patch" release in the 2.x series, I > guess?)
Yes. >> Future feature releases will then be numbered >> >> 3.1, 3.2, ..., 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, ... > > Out of curiosity, does this mean that 3.x will drop the convention of > odd-numbered minor versions being developmental? (Actually, I can't > recall ever actually seeing an odd-numbered minor version...) The odd/even convention was dropped back when we converted to a Git branchy workflow by commit v2.8.2~105^2~4 (New version scheme to support branchy workflow, 2010-04-23): http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bfffd6f It's just that "2.8" essentially became the "major" version so 2.8.x have been the minor releases, including odd 'x' values. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
