On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 17:13:12 +0200, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> The Ninja generator was much slower than the Makefiles generator. I pushed
> the optimize-source-file-processing topic with a commit which should fix the
> major problem with Ninja. I'll see if there is more opportunity for
> optimizing/caching though in general.
Gah. This is on my huge stack of performance topics (which is getting
stalled due to available time). Please look at:
https://github.com/mathstuf/CMake/tree/dev/source-file-performance
https://github.com/mathstuf/CMake/tree/dev/custom-target-performance
What can be merged with those branches?
--Ben
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
