On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 01:30:58 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Anton Makeev ... > > * No progress indication. Since the generation may take several minutes, > > > > providing feedback is crucial. > > I never found such case, I would argue that a project which has a > cmake script that takes several minutes is broken, but maybe we can > open a thread to discuss it?
On network file systems things can get slow... (even if the file system feels really fast in general usage, i.e. has high data throuhgput). ... > > * Not sure if it’s possible at all - a lightweight phase where CMake only > > > > collects necessary information (list of files/targets, compiler > > settings). > > This will help IDE react to the changes much faster. > > That would be extra-cool, agreed. Maybe it's an iteration we can > consider in the future. Yes, this would be cool, but until now whenever I thought about this my conclusion was that this is unfortunately not possible, since the targets/files/etc. can depend on anything, if() clauses, execution of commands, results of find_package(), etc. Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
