On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 21:52:26 -0000, James Johnston wrote: > d. If the answer to (c) is yes, should that keyword become the default, > subject to a new policy? (And introduction of a different NO_RESPECT_UMASK > keyword).
FWIW, the install(1) tool does not respect umask by default (and has no option for it), so I think the default should be to ignore the umask. Having an option is fine, but it should be documented that this is non-standard behavior in terms of what most (autotools) installs do. --Ben -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
