On 09/21/2015 05:51 PM, Michael Scott wrote: > Yes the -Werr-dev, -Wno-err-dev, -Werr-deprectated and > -Wno-err-deprecated may be trickier than expected to get behaving as > intended. I'll try and get a better idea of the users of IssueMessage > and see if some ideas come to mind. Removing them would be fair enough > at this point, better to not include them than to include broken > functionality I'm sure. Do new features, such as -Werr-dev, have to be > sent by October 1st is it?
Oct 1 is the feature freeze in 'master' for CMake 3.4, though the scale/scope of new features should be going down as we approach that date. In this case we have a bug in a new feature that was introduced in post-3.3 development so we need to either fix it or remove the offending parts of the new features before Oct 1 for 3.4. Thanks, -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
