On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> HI Levi, > > Thanks for coming forward to work on this! > > On 11/16/2015 11:34 AM, Levi Morrison wrote: > > Why is MSVC doing a version check around the CXX_STANDARD_DEFAULT? > > The version check delimits the set of versions for which CMake > has recorded knowledge of C++ feature availability. So… should I bound this by versions that exist? For instance, there is no Intel 17.0 so should I limit this? > Should I be doing this for Intel as well? > > I also don't know the complete version numbers for some of these > > things, such as how far back they support `-std=c++98`. I only > > have Intel compilers from version 12.0 and up. Should I guard > > the CMAKE_CXX98_STANDARD_COMPILE_OPTION around 12 since that's > > all I have available to test? > > Yes. If you cannot reliably fill out the information for older > versions then just leave them out. Others can fill them in if > needed. This is what was done for MSVC and GNU compilers. > Thank you. I'll work on this and have another patch ready.
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
