Dear All,
I was hoping to get some feedback from the developers on which direction to
take this in. As I wrote before, I'm happy to help. But I don't want to spend
time on an implementation that people will not accept in the end. I'd like us
to first agree on how the code should behave after the addition of this new
feature.
Cheers,
Attila
> On 09 Dec 2015, at 15:38, Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:19:45 +0100, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
>> I myself am on the side of simplicity. Using regular expressions would
>> allow us to do what I want. But if >95% of the people using this new
>> possibility would use it exactly like I plan to, then implementing it
>> in a more complicated way than necessary would just be a bad design
>> choice.
>
> Do you have performance numbers for the change in your build between
> using include_directories (or target_include_directories), with and
> without SYSTEM, each with and without this change?
>
> --Ben
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
