Good Morning/Evening. I have great news. With Nighly Build 3.5.20160208 the regression was gone, and the Generation performance is almost the as with CMake 3.4.3.
Here are details: Version 3.2.2 real 2m0.780s user 1m55.704s sys 0m2.360s Version 3.4.3 real 1m30.223s user 1m24.816s sys 0m3.004s Version 3.5.0rc1 real 6m20.086s user 6m15.836s sys 0m3.600s Version nigtly build 3.5.20160208 real 1m29.047s user 1m24.232s sys 0m3.040s Thank you Bartosz 2016-02-09 20:51 GMT+01:00 Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com>: > On 02/09/2016 02:39 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > So what branch should we follow if we want to test the on-going 3.5.x > > effort? > > > > I assumed it would be "release" > > Yes. I just merged several of the fixes there this morning. > > > but one of the key fixes to 3.5.0-rc1 is the efficiency one > [snip] > > Are those changes being "cooked" a bit longer or are they already in > > the release branch under some different title? > > They are cooking in 'master' for few days. This will give Bartosz > (who reported the performance problem) some time to confirm the fixes > work. > > The fixes are also available in the nightly binaries since those > are built from 'next'. > > -Brad > >
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
