That sounds good. On 1 Jul 2016 22:58, "Brad King" <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 05:35 PM, Dave Gittins wrote: > > I don't understand the harm of documenting the options and making > > them public. > > The discussion got side-tracked on how to do it with the currently > documented interface. > > > Seems to me that they are > > a) used > > b) useful > > c) safe > > We can consider making them public but in addition to the documentation > we should: > > * Consider providing alternative options with more intuitive names > and making those public instead. Currently "-H" stands for "Home" > which is an internal name within CMake's implementation and is not > a name whose meaning is public-facing. > > * Allow the form `-H <value> -B <value>` with the new names. > > * Extend the test suite (e.g. RunCMake.CommandLine) with cases > covering the public-facing options. > > -Brad >
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
