Thank you for the warning and support. We would prefer to not maintain a fork, but I have not been able to find any other technology that is suitable.
For future reference. The intended use-case is for CMake to act as an engine in an IDE project generator solution similar to the below solutions[0]. [0] http://start.atmel.com/ http://www.st.com/en/embedded-software/stm32cube-embedded-software.html -----Original Message----- From: Brad King [mailto:brad.k...@kitware.com] Sent: 26. januar 2017 14:18 To: Bøe, Sebastian <sebastian....@nordicsemi.no> Cc: ben.boec...@kitware.com; cmake-developers@cmake.org Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build On 01/26/2017 05:57 AM, Bøe, Sebastian wrote: > I will investigate relocatable builds, because in spite of this not > being trivial, I think CMake still comes out as the best suited technology > for my use-case. We once had an option to produce relative paths in the build system and it was a never ending mess of bugs. Eventually it was ripped out. It is unlikely we will accept changes to try to re-introduce such an option. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
