> > 2) Use libuv instead I just saw the libuv library in the CMake sources. > libuv for process management is on the list. I think it is waiting for > porting to all of CMake's platforms to actually happen.
Does that mean it's only there for some specific scenarios and shouldn't be used in general? > I'm seeing this PR hung up on process: > > https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/1527 > > I don't know how much followup work there is. I thought there was a > CMake issue tracking it, but I don't see one. IIUC this is about the CPU affinity for child processes? Looks nice, but in AUTOMOC/UIC it's sufficient to just known which child processes are running and to get a notification when one has finished. I think that this level of control is available in libuv already. Sebastian -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
