John Biddiscombe wrote:
Brandon
I'm not really interested in converting the boost maintainers to
cmake. I'm not at all interested in what they think about cmake
("Political buy-in" is of no concern to me). I have cmakeified so many
projects that doing one more (even if it's quite a big one) doesn't
put me off.
Hm, then I'm surprised you felt a need to ask about the level of
difficulty.
(And I have the advantage that I only really care about win/linux
targets). The trouble is that I'm distributing source code and don't
want to have to distribute and install boost everywhere. or put
endless checks in my code to see if it's there. CMakeifying it would
solve my woes. Problem is it's a lot of work :(
Maybe you were just thinking out loud about what a PITA it's gonna be. :-)
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
