Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi, Von: "Brandon J. Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Like everyone else who isn't helping with the wiki page, I have higher priorities right now, like getting the Chicken Scheme CMake build in top shape, and adopted as the standard build. And parallel with that, I'll be working on OpenGL demos. I want these evangelical tools, both for Chicken and for CMake, before I want better docs. The problem with documentation is, once you've personally learned what you need, you have no incentive to improve the documentation. If I were trying to train a bunch of people in CMake I'd have an incentive, but that's not currently what I'm trying to do. Documentation is a weak spot of open source development in general. It's easier to get things documented when people are getting paid to do it. I wonder at Kitware's stake in this. Previously, I thought they were just profit-conscious, that they wanted to force people to buy their book to get the best support. But it seems their book doesn't have all needed information either, so it is not in fact the best support. The best support is asking right here! It does, at least, fit with their rapid development model. I'm tempted to say that the Kitware guys are just much stronger coders than documentarians. Much like their open source peers. Cheers, Brandon Van Every |
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
