Tim Teulings wrote: > On the other hand PKGCONFIG already has options to directly return > apropiate values for these two variables, so why are they not used in > the PKGCONFIG macro? I would expect that the result of the PKGCONFIG > macro is already optimal prepared for easy call of CMake macros. It does > not make sense to put the burden of postprocessing to every makefile if > this postprocessing of pkg-config executable return values can be done > *in* the PKGCONFIG macro.
The macro was a user contribution and has not really been used/reviewed by too many people yet. If you would like to contribute improvements feel free to post them here for discussion. You could also open a feature request in the bug tracker: http://www.cmake.org/Bug and post suggestions and/or patches. -Brad _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
