Le Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:47:33 +0200, Alan W. Irwin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
Excuse my windows ignorance, but is LoadLibrary the standard way to
dynamically load plug-ins for all the varieties of windows?
I'm mostly a linux developer so all I say can be wrong but
I think it is (don't remember where I read It, should check msdn)
Based on the bad autotools experience noted above, we haven't yet
evaluated
libltdl for loading plug-ins built by CMake for any kind of windows
platform. But if LoadLibrary is considered to be pretty standard, then we
will try harder to get plug-ins built properly for windows.
That's my guess.
Are there any tricks to building plug-ins on windows that our developers
should be aware of?
I think you should check all the symbol visibility stuff:
see __declspec(dllimport) and __declspec(dllexport).
If a real windows developer gets around this thread and is willing to
help... :)
--
Thomas Arcila, PhD candidate
http://www-id.imag.fr/~arcila
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
