On 5/9/07, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CMake does have a test suite that checks for most of this stuff. My guess is that if you made that change something would fail. But if it did not fail, that would not mean that it would not cause a problem, just that we did not yet create the test for the problem.
Sure. But when a person declares something "pointless," if they are asked to run the standard test suite, it will shorten the conversation. Nothing wrong with a "heads up" question as per the original post, but really, why argue in detail about design decisions that are probably there for a reason? Either a logical reason or a historical reason; doesn't matter. Rob, I'd still like to know the original problem that prompted you to delve into this. I read this thread because I've faked convenience libraries. What was your driving problem? Cheers, Brandon Van Every
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
