On 7/31/07, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 09:51, you wrote: > ... > > Great! If you personally think this is good and can review/apply the > > patches relatively quickly then that will work well for me. What I was > > worried about was that I open a feature request and, understandably > > so, it sits there to be taken care according to everyone's busy > > schedule... > > > > I sent the patch to the list last night, but it rejected the e-mail > > because it was too big... I'll now clean up the code according to the > > coding style and resend with cc to you. This time tared and zipped, so > > it shouldn't have a problem. > > Thanks :-)
Attached is the file. I changed some variable names and other minor things, but I'm not certain it follows all the coding standards. I leave that to your inspection, although please point out whatever you find that you needed to fix for my future reference. Also, note that I dislike al the long runs of "fout << ...". However, I expect all that to change as I get a better understanding of the .project/.cproject options and format. So, I'll refactor it later... they are private implementations anyway. > > Now, I want to open a Wiki entry on > > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Generator_Specific_Information for > > "Eclipse CDT Generator" stating that a generator for Eclipse CDT is in > > development with a link to a new page called "Eclipse CDT Generator > > Development" for a page that everyone interested in this development > > should watch to discuss it. All of those interested in this development are encouraged to watch the following wiki page: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Eclipse_CDT4_Generator_Development It only has a screenshot, but I'll start writing down discussion topics very soon. --Miguel
eclipse_cdt4_generator.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
