I think having the last 2 versions is a good idea... that way if the latest and greatest gets a bad bug in it, there is a way to back down to the previous version
>>> "Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/08/2007 2:19 a.m. >>> On 8/3/07, Eric Noulard wrote: > 2007/8/3, Bill Hoffman : > > So, I don't want to fill the disk with these things. > > Should I just remove the previous night, or maybe > > only put them out every two weeks? > > I would say that keeping the last 2 successful builds should be more than enough > for (my) currently forseen usage. I don't use or need daily snapshots since I update and compile through cvs, but I agree that it should be *daily* snapshots and buffer them as you see fit... 2 is already 2 more than I need anyway ;) --Miguel _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WARNING: This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or privileged. They are intended for the addressee only and are not to be read, used, copied or disseminated by anyone receiving them in error. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message and any attachments. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the official views of Landcare Research. SirTrack http://www.sirtrack.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
