On Friday 21 September 2007 04:31, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On 9/20/07, Christian Buhtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the difference between cmake and bakefiles? > > http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=Bakefile.Comparisons > > CMake is the most similar to Bakefile from these. It generates > semi-native makefiles -- while the makefile is for the native make > tool, it still requires presence of CMake during compilation. Bakefile > has no such requirement. CMake also does (auto-)configuration (like > Autoconf), which Bakefile doesn't. > > > I guess you could also try on the KDE ML since they have investigated > multiple solutions before choosing cmake (I do not recall they ever > mention bakefiles)...
No, bakefile wasn't among the candidates: considered imature, nobody actually suggested it. We (KDE) tried scons for some months, but had problems and didn't get support nor were patches accepted by the scons developers. Alex _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
