On 10/4/07, Torsten Martinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Baptiste Derongs <> wrote:
>
> > The point is that I want a MakeFile that creates only the .o file,
> > doesnt try to get binary. Next that same Makefile (and other ones)
> > need the .o file to make other binaries.
>
> Instead of focussing on how to do this small step, you should probably
> explain what it is you are trying to do, i.e. why you think that you
> need to explicitly split up the steps of compiling and linking.

Actually I have a file that contains a lot of functions, call this
file global.c.
Next I have multiple files, call them f1.c, f2.c, ...

And each f*.c has to be compiled with global.c.
Obviously I can do gcc f1.c global.c -o f1 for each file, but I think
that it'll be faster to first make the .o, and next to do gcc f1.c
global.o -o f1.

Am I wrong ? If the first solution is good that's cool for me, but I
thought that was not very proper.

>
> -Torsten
>
> This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be 
> privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This 
> information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, 
> retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part 
> thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with 
> GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
> _______________________________________________
> CMake mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to