> Is backward compatibility with the current language a goal of the LUA > experiment? I ask because the examples spoken of on this list appear to be > trying to mimic the current CMake syntax.
Right now I think it's just an experiment to see how things might work, how much effort would be involved, and how much of an impedance mismatch there will be with how things are currently done. It sounds like things may not progress any further unless a real long term vision for CMake is developed and embraced. _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake