Bill Hoffman escreveu: > > However, I never intended for the language to be used as a general > purpose programming tool. There are much better languages out there for > that type of thing.
I couldn't agree more. > As to why I regret starting this thread, I think it is a waste of my > time. Most likely 3 or 4 bugs from the CMake bug tracker were not closed > because I have been reading/writing emails on this thread. As someone > pointed out there are plenty of bugs in the tracker to fix! Hehe, look at the monster I've created! But it's been a healthy discussion, at least I'm convinced that CMake shouldn't use Lua. I still think it would be better, but it's not feasible in its current state and wouldn't add nothing fundamental regarding build systems. Regards, rod _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
