On Friday 21 December 2007, George Neill wrote: > Hi Brandon, ... > ... thinking out loud ... > > 1. 'make all' shouldn't include this psuedo target (becuase it's > already covered with first,second and third) > > 2. sub-project dependencies (might be painful?) ... maybe I wouldn't > have to mess with them? > > Thoughts?
I think it may be not that hard, it also makes some sense, but to me this would feel a bit like bloat. Alex _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
