On Dec 25, 2007 10:18 AM, Andrew Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 23, 2007 2:50 PM, Andrew Roark wrote: > > > What's a major project > > in SCons or some other build system that would be really clunky to do > > in CMake? > > I think the point the other poster in this thread and the posters in the Lua > discussions are making is that CMake is a good meta build system, not clunky > as you hint at, but that the _CMake script language_ is clunky and less > powerful than a real language.
Clunky, fine. "Less powerful" with respect to build systems, has yet to be proven. Until someone proves it, with a concrete example, Kitware will never be convinced that any "better" language is needed. So I'm saying, quit talking about how Lua or some other language is supposed to be better, and find something that proves it would be better. Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
