Can't you use "PATTERN" without the "EXCLUDE" to achieve this?
On 12/28/07, Rodolfo Lima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brandon Van Every escreveu: > > > "Too" cumbersome? Surely you jest. What's a long-winded list of > > patterns in terms of your development time? Two minutes tops? > > Oh well... thanks for teaching me another word: jest, and I'm not being > ironic. > > Back to business... imagine the following use case: a project mixes > headers and source files all inside the same directory, along with other > files. During install, I want to get all headers and copy to > <prefix>/include/mylib. That's it. I think this is a very common > scenario. Right now I'm using cmake to compile and install external > libraries needed for my project that aren't installed by default in the > build system. Say I need to upgrade this library... I don't want to mess > with the build/install recipe again just to add a possibly new file that > was added. > > What I'm doing right now is getting the header names using file(GLOB > ...) then installing them, but this is not a direct solution (as PATTERN > ... EXCLUDE is). > > > Sure, "it's easier." Sounds like a low priority feature request to > > me. File it in the bug tracker. > > I could implement it if I knew that it would be committed to cvs, that's > why I posted the idea here first. > > Happy new year, > rod > > _______________________________________________ > CMake mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake >
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
