Bill Hoffman wrote:
So what exactly about the CMake language gives you this feel?
That would be:
1) the syntax
and
2) the modularity constructs
I know its 'only' scripting to manage declarations into the engine.
Its a shame you can't write emitters except in C++ but that certainly
wouldn't
be something I'd want to try with a language like this.
But if we did that would we have a binary that that had all the
"wrapped" languages?
Why? I don't care what you ship in the CMake core library. I just want
to be able to do any
coding in my project in a manner that's comfortable.
Even if the result is mixed, a few lines in site config should enable
the engine to find the
interpreter DLLs and integrate them.
James
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
