Bill Hoffman wrote:
Clinton Stimpson wrote:
I was getting better numbers than that with parallel builds (is that
expected?).
A plain make was a touch faster, and make pqCore was almost 2x as fast.
Yes, parallel builds should be faster, as the checks for some targets
can be done in parallel. I was just trying show the worst case and
get the amount of time make spends doing nothing but checking times.
Of course if it can do nothing in parallel it will be that much faster
at doing nothing... :)
-Bill
Right, in general, it is faster.
To clarify, I meant a parallel build (-j4) of pqCore was twice as fast
with CMake 2.6 than in 2.4.
Clint
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
