-- Mike Jackson Senior Research Engineer
Innovative Management & Technology Services


On Apr 12, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-04-12 10:07+0200 Andreas Pakulat wrote:

<personal opinion>
My experience with MinGW so far is that its simply not ready yet for
projects such as boost or KDE, they still need some time. Thats why
I won't do work on getting KDevelop4 working on MinGW - at least not
without someone paying for it.
</personal opinion>

That's fine, but then somebody else with access to windows should
volunteer to do that testing since MinGW is an extremely important platform.

I don't have access to windows myself, but I have been fascinated over the years at just how popular MinGW has been at SourceForge. Usually, that software is in the top 25 projects there (rated in terms of an activity index made up of a number of factors including downloads). For example,
from
http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php? group_id=2435&ugn=mingw&type=prdownload&mode=12months&year=2008&packag e_id=0 they have from 300 to 600 thousand (!) downloads per month over the last
year.

Finally, from our PLplot experience, MinGW (fortunately we do have a couple of developers with access to that platform) works fine if you make some special adjustments for its needs. So Andreas's above statement probably needs to be reversed, i.e., boost and KDE need some time/effort to work on MinGW. Such effort should be worth it since there is obviously _a lot_ of
interest in the MinGW platform that would be a shame to ignore for any
project.

My $0.02.

Alan

__________________________
Alan W. Irwin



And just to add some more info about boost:

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/more/getting_started/ windows.html#identify-your-toolset

Under the "Toolset" column is "gcc" with the following description:
gcc
The Gnu Project
Includes support for Cygwin and MinGW compilers.

So, boost is directly supporting MinGW. So should FindBoost.cmake.

Now.. if we could just convince Boost to switch to CMake from bjam..

Cheers
----
Mike
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to