> I'm curious what the timings are with and without the include paths. Can you > give some data? > If I remember right, this thread started by talking about compile times.
That's right! I just tried on phonon-vlc-mplayer http://code.google.com/p/phonon-vlc-mplayer/ the timing argument just is not an argument as I thought: 1) with no Qt modules included $time make real 2m57.113s -> 177s user 2m42.906s sys 0m12.297s 2) with all Qt modules included $time make real 3m5.236s -> 185s user 2m49.619s sys 0m13.941s As you see, there is almost no difference, not even 5%. Historically I was convince that timing differences where huge: on another project, 2 years ago, using SCons, a colleague convince me that using #include <QtGui/Q..> was useful with compilation time almost divided by 2. I guess after this small test, that the good timings that we got were due to SCons not handling -I in a proper way. (SCons is/was not scalable) I think the best now is probably not to modify UseQt4.cmake and I will stick with my small macro that optimize the include path as I prefer to have a smaller include path (more readable and easier to debug). -- Tanguy Krotoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +33 6 68 42 70 24 _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
