On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 23:55:30 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Hendrik Sattler >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 23:17:18 schrieb Alexander Neundorf: >> >> On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Hendrik Sattler wrote: >> >> > Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 22:24:12 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: >> >> > > Did you figure out a way to install 32bits debian package in the >> >> > > /emul/ia32 subdirectory ? How did you install your target system >> >> > > environment. On my debian box, the ia32-libs package works somewhat >> >> > > ok, but it only provide the runtime 32bits libs (not the include >> >> > > file for instance). >> >> > >> >> > The include files do not differ (they are architecture-independent) >> >> > for normal projects. Why would you want to install a second set? >> >> >> >> Because they could differ, e.g. different versions or whatever. >> > >> > Not in a distribution like Debian. Well unless you are using unstable as >> > it has a reason to be called like that. >> > For other cases, the e.g ia32- packaes on amd64 have the same version. >> > And in this case, they do not differ. >> > >> > On other systems where you have 32bit and 64bit libraries mixed (e.g. >> > Solaris), you also only have _one_ include directory. >> >> Very impressive... this means that at any level of inclusion none of >> the include files has any system specific declaration (even gcc >> header!). > > gcc is not normal software. It actually needs to be specially ported to > architectures and thus is always special. But the compiler knows where to > find its include files, so you rarely need to worry about that, do you? > > Unless headers are generated at build time of the software that you depend on, > how could they possibly be different? libz doesn't, just to use your > example...
Ok I have two questions then for you: 1. what is the flag for gcc to generate byte code for powerpc (-mcpu=powerpc is deprecated) 2. what is the difference between the gcc package and gcc-multilib. If gcc package still exist and has not been replaced by gcc-multilib, there must be a reason... -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
