Mike Arthur wrote:
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 09:59:11 Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
Is there something I can do to move this onwards?
Personally, I think it would be beneficial to have a repository with
experimental CMake modules, from which the kitware people could move
modules into the "official" build when they have been sufficiently tested.
After all, not many of us have experience with building under all the
supported platforms, so most of us will need help testing. On the other
hand, having all these modules sort of floating around on mailing list
would be suboptimal for a number of obvious reasons.
Agreed, I've submitted a bunch of modules to the bugtracker and received no
feedback on them or news about inclusion in the tree.
It might be an idea for someone to create a Google Code project or something
with unofficial modules which perhaps Kitware would link to and we can plaster
over the wiki.
Please see here:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
and here:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2007-July/015258.html
New modules added to the bug tracker are generally ignored. Patches for
existing ones are assigned to the maintainer.
-Bill
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
