On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I would keep this separate. You only need to setup the environment once. > This is a completely different task then the actual development. > Additionally: why not provide one package for your developers that they > only have to unpack to some dir and can start? Why should they all > compile the same thing? This way, only one has to go through the trouble > of porting an compiling the stuff. > That is roughly equal to installing your distribution's packages. Well on Linux this would be trivial, but as I said on Windows doing this could take hours, even if I do provide a simple package they can extract to some directory, they'll still be faced with the challenge of building all libraries in that package that I provide.
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
