On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 13:02, Bartlett, Roscoe A <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone else have similar frustrations with FindMPI.cmake and would like > to see a new implementation as described above? How many CMake projects > have a serious MPI component that use FindMPI.cmake?
I make do with the current implementation, but it is a bit brittle and I would prefer the implementation you describe. I suspect the history comes from regarding MPI as `just another library' in which case wrapper compilers are not desirable since you can't combine wrappers. Some will surely disagree, but I'm happy to give MPI special priority. Jed _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
