On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Mike Arthur <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 02:24:17 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > Of course, you can debate forever whether such a SF project would be > > successful or not, but the only way to really know is to try it and see. > > That is, start with something small and expand from there. I don't have > > time to help with such a SF project myself at this time, but I think it > is > > a good idea that has a reasonable chance of success, and I would > certainly > > be cheering from the sidelines. > I would suggest that we definitely give it a try but perhaps not on > SourceForge, Google Code is far easier to use (in my opinion). I'd be interested in trying Google Code for a project. I'll gather everyone's email addresses that was interested and schedule an IRC planning meeting to discuss some of the project goals and packaging standards. I would like to have consistent ways to enable/disable "make install" for example so that the CMakified packages can be used within someone's source tree or to generate prebuilts. -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
