> Do you feel that I'm better off using Boost_LIBRARIES? >> > > If you're comfortable with maintaining the dependencies where they are > needed I would recommend doing it the way you were planning on and use > Boost_<COMPONENT>_LIBRARY, it also handles the debug/optimized links for > Visual Studio. I only mentioned Boost_LIBRARIES so you knew it existed and > a partial theory as to why this documentation bug probably hasn't cropped up > on the mailing list before. There actually are a couple of good reasons not > to use Boost_LIBRARIES (linking time would in theory be faster, if done > correctly you would know at a glance which libraries of yours depend on > which boost libraries). > > That being said most people probably don't really care. :) >
Thanks for your insights. I guess I'll go with Boost_<COMPONENT>_LIBRARY for now since its working now. Thanks, Eric
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
