2009/7/16 Michael Wild <[email protected]>: >> >> May be there is some equivalent on Windows platform too >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682586(VS.85).aspx >> [just pointing the link, I'm really no windows expert and .... >> don't want to become one :-) ] > > Seriously, that platform is just plain broken if you ask me. > __declspec(dllimport), __declspec(dllexport)?! What were they thinking?
Visibility control in shared libs may not be considered as evil, GCC even supports that feature: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility in particular you may read "2.2 Export Control" in http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf > And > DLL-exported C++ template instantiations with member templates simply don't > work. Sometimes I marvel at why so many people go trough the pains of > writing software for such a broken system... This is another story :-) -- Erk Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
