Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/29/2009 02:38 PM, Will Dicharry wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/29/2009 02:31 PM, Will Dicharry wrote:
Orion,

While searching for probable causes of hdf5.h being in your /usr/include
without H5pubconf.h (it is required by hdf5.h), I came across some
patches in fedora 11 cvs that you have made to hdf5 code. Is it possible
that your system has a bad hdf5 install?

I plan on submitting the fix to check for existence, but I'd really like to know the circumstances that lead to hdf5.h existing while H5pubconf.h
does not exist.


multi-arch compatibility. H5pubconf.h is different for 32-bit and
64-bit builds of hdf5. So, we make H5pubconf-32.h and H5pubconf-64.h
and include the appropriate one as needed in H5public.h. As I
understand it, no one should be including H5pubconf.h directly.


Agreed, but the find module uses H5pubconf.h to determine if the found
HDF5 install is serial or parallel. If I can't find the file, then I
guess the value will need to default to serial. Do you believe this is
acceptable behavior?

It's probably safe. I can also probably change the hdf5 package to also use alternatives for H5pubconf.h so that it can be checked.


Just so I understand...Are you referring to alternatives in the Fedora packaging sense?

-- Will

--
Will Dicharry
Software Developer
Stellar Science Ltd Co

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to